A Meta-Analytic Review of the Effectiveness of Engineering Design Process in Enhancing STEM Competence
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46328/ijemst.5224Keywords:
engineering design process, meta-analysis, STEM competence, STEM educationAbstract
This meta-analysis synthesized 18 qualified studies, resulting in 29 effect sizes. This study involved a total sample of 1,280 students to evaluate the effectiveness of Engineering Design Process (EDP)-based instructional approaches in STEM education. Eligible studies were systematically selected through inclusion and exclusion criteria following the PRISMA protocol, and effect sizes were computed using Hedge’s g, applying random-effect model due to substantial heterogeneity (Qe = 156.367, df = 28, p < 0.001). The overall effect size (ES = 1.168) reflects a strong positive impact of EDP-based interventions on STEM learning. Meta-regression analysis further revealed that tertiary education level significantly moderated the effect size (p=0.033), while STEM competence type and implementation period did not yield statistically significant effects. The findings also revealed that scientific creativity and engineering-focused STEM integration were the most frequently enhanced STEM competence and instructional approach used on the reviewed studies respectively. These findings support the pedagogical strength of EDP in fostering inquiry-driven, higher-order thinking and suggest tailoring approaches based on learner’s academic level to maximize impact.
References
Panergayo, A.A.E. (2025). A meta-analytic review of the effectiveness of engineering design process in enhancing STEM competence. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science, and Technology (IJEMST), 13(6), 1416-1430. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijemst.5224
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Articles may be used for research, teaching, and private study purposes. Authors alone are responsible for the contents of their articles. The journal owns the copyright of the articles. The publisher shall not be liable for any loss, actions, claims, proceedings, demand, or costs or damages whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with or arising out of the use of the research material.
The author(s) of a manuscript agree that if the manuscript is accepted for publication in the journal, the published article will be copyrighted using a Creative Commons “Attribution 4.0 International” license. This license allows others to freely copy, distribute, and display the copyrighted work, and derivative works based upon it, under certain specified conditions.
Authors are responsible for obtaining written permission to include any images or artwork for which they do not hold copyright in their articles, or to adapt any such images or artwork for inclusion in their articles. The copyright holder must be made explicitly aware that the image(s) or artwork will be made freely available online as part of the article under a Creative Commons “Attribution 4.0 International” license.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

