Students’ Perceptions of Low Stakes Positioning Tests at the Start of Higher STEM Education: A Mixed Methods Approach
887
565
Abstract
In Flanders, open admission into higher education has led to heterogeneity in academic preparedness of incoming STEM students. Higher education institutions offer low stakes positioning tests to these students in order to help them assess their level of starting competences. Due to the unique nature of these tests, little can be inferred about students’ perception of these tests. In this study, we used mixed methods to investigate these perceptions. Semi-structured interviews (n=20) and thematic analysis revealed that students do not always understand the stakes, objective and structure of positioning tests as intended by the organizers. A questionnaire (n=189) revealed that students considered chemistry problems better reflecting certain study programs than mathematics problems and that they wrongly think chemistry questions are more predictive than mathematics questions. Our findings provide insight in STEM students’ multifaceted perceptions of and interaction with low stakes assessment.
Keywords
Students' perception, Perception of assessment, Higher STEM education, Low stakes assessment
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Hanssens, J., Langie, G., & Van Soom, C. (2023). Students’ perceptions of low stakes positioning tests at the start of higher STEM education: A mixed methods approach. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science, and Technology (IJEMST), 11(5), 1094-1112. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijemst.2889
DOI: https://doi.org/10.46328/ijemst.2889
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2023 International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology
International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology (IJEMST)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
ISSN: 2147-611X (Online)