Explicit Instruction about the Nature of Science and its Impact on Students’ Understanding of Evolution: A Meta-Analysis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46328/ijemst.5327Keywords:
Nature of science, Evolution education, Misconceptions, Meta-analysisAbstract
Understanding evolution remains a persistent challenge in science education. This meta-analysis evaluated whether explicit instruction on the Nature of Science (NOS) can enhance students’ comprehension of evolutionary theory. A systematic review following PRISMA 2020 guidelines identified eight studies (2017–2024), yielding nine independent effect sizes and a total sample of 1,543 students across secondary and undergraduate levels. Using a random-effects model, the overall effect of explicit NOS instruction was large and statistically significant (Hedges’ g = 1.18, 95% CI [0.698, 1.669], p < .001). Moderator analysis showed that educational level significantly influenced outcomes, with secondary students benefiting more than undergraduates. A Two One-Sided Tests (TOST) procedure confirmed that these differences were not practically equivalent within a ±0.20 margin. Qualitative synthesis revealed that the most effective interventions explicitly addressed NOS concepts, such as theory vs. law, empirical evidence, and subjectivity through historical case studies and structured reflection designed to counter evolution misconceptions. No evidence of publication bias was detected. These findings underscore the pedagogical value of embedding epistemological instruction within evolution education and support the development of context-sensitive curricula and teacher training.
References
Balgopal, M. M. (2014). Learning and intending to teach evolution: Concerns of pre-service biology teachers. Research in Science Education, 44(1), 27–52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-013-9371-0
Barnes, M. E., Dunlop, H. M., Sinatra, G. M., Hendrix, T. M., Zheng, Y., & Brownell, S. E. (2020). “Accepting evolution means you can’t believe in god”: Atheistic perceptions of evolution among college biology students. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 19(2), ar21. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.19-05-0106
Borgerding, L. A., & Deniz, H. (2018). Evolution education around the globe: Conclusions and future directions. In H. Deniz & L. A. Borgerding (Eds.), Evolution Education Around the Globe (pp. 449–464). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90939-4_24
Brandt, M., Groom, Q., Magro, A., Misevic, D., Narraway, C. L., Bruckermann, T., Beniermann, A., Børsen, T., González, J., Meeus, S., Roy, H. E., Sá-Pinto, X., Torres, J. R., & Jenkins, T. (2022). Promoting scientific literacy in evolution through citizen science. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 289(1980), 20221077. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2022.1077
Campbell, A. (2018). Evolution education in New Zealand. In H. Deniz & L. A. Borgerding (Eds.), Evolution Education Around the Globe (pp. 431–446). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90939-4_23
Cheng, K. L., & Chan, K. H. (2018). Evolution education in Hong Kong (1991–2016): A content analysis of the biology textbooks for secondary school graduates. In H. Deniz & L. A. Borgerding (Eds.), Evolution Education Around the Globe (pp. 315–333). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90939-4_17
Cofré, H., Núñez, P., Becerra, B., Cuevas, E., Santibáñez, D., & Jiménez Pavez, J. (2017). Efecto de la historia de la ciencia en la comprensión de naturaleza de ciencia y la comprensión y aceptación de la teoría de la evolución en estudiantes de secundaria. Enseñanza de las Ciencias: revista de investigación y experiencias didácticas, Extra, 3649–3656. https://raco.cat/index.php/Ensenanza/article/view/337121
Cofré, H., Núñez, P., Santibáñez, D., Pavez, J., & Vergara, C. (2018a). Theory, evidence, and examples of teaching the nature of science and biology using the history of science: A Chilean experience. In M. E. D. B. Prestes & C. C. Silva (Eds.), Teaching Science with Context (pp. 65–84). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74036-2_5
Cofré, H., Santibáñez, D., Jiménez, J., Spotorno, A., Carmona, F., Navarrete, K., & Vergara, C. (2018b). The effect of teaching the nature of science on students’ acceptance and understanding of evolution: Myth or reality? Journal of Biological Education, 52(3), 248–261. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2017.1326968
De Lima, J., & Long, T. M. (2023). Students explain evolution by natural selection differently for humans versus nonhuman animals. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 22(4), ar48. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.21-06-0145
Deniz, H., & Borgerding, L. A. (2018). Evolutionary theory as a controversial topic in science curriculum around the globe. In H. Deniz & L. A. Borgerding (Eds.), Evolution Education Around the Globe (pp. 3–11). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90939-4_1
Eymur, G., Yeşildağ Hasançebi, F., & Çetin, P. S. (2024). The influence of nature of science embedded in the argument-driven inquiry instructional method to promote content knowledge and self-efficacy of pre-service science teachers in evolution. Journal of Biological Education, 58(3), 552–569. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2022.2092189
Fouad, K. E. (2018). Pedagogical implications of American Muslims’ views on evolution. In H. Deniz & L. A. Borgerding (Eds.), Evolution Education Around the Globe (pp. 15–39). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90939-4_2
Gregory, T. R. (2009). Understanding natural selection: Essential concepts and common misconceptions. Evolution: Education and Outreach, 2(2), 156–175. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12052-009-0128-1
Jiménez Pavez, J. P. (2022). Assessing the impact of understanding nature of scientific knowledge and understanding nature of scientific inquiry on learning about evolution in high school students. Dissertations. https://www.proquest.com/dissertations-theses/assessing-impact-understanding-nature-scientific/docview/2675949632/se-2
Johnston, S. L., Knabb, M., Auld, J. R., & Rieser-Danner, L. (2022). Correcting misconceptions about evolution: An innovative, inquiry-based introductory biological anthropology laboratory course improves understanding of evolution compared to instructor-centered courses. Evolution: Education and Outreach, 15(1), 6. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12052-022-00164-4
Kahana, O., & Tal, T. (2014). Understanding of high-achieving science students on the nature of science. International Journal of STEM Education, 1(1), 13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-014-0013-5
Kampourakis, K. (2022). Reconsidering the goals of evolution education: Defining evolution and evolutionary literacy. Evolution: Education and Outreach, 15(1), 21. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12052-022-00180-4
Lederman, N. G., & Lederman, J. S. (2019). Teaching and learning nature of scientific knowledge: Is it Déjà vu all over again? Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research, 1(1), 6. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43031-019-0002-0
Lin, L., & Aloe, A. M. (2021). Evaluation of various estimators for standardized mean difference in meta‐analysis. Statistics in Medicine, 40(2), 403–426. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.8781
Lombrozo, T., Thanukos, A., & Weisberg, M. (2008). The importance of understanding the nature of science for accepting evolution. Evolution: Education and Outreach, 1(3), 290–298. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12052-008-0061-8
Moreno, L., Zuñiga, K., Cofré, H., & Merino, C. (2018). Efecto (¿O no?) de la inclusión de naturaleza de la ciencia en una secuencia para el aprendizaje y la aceptación de la teoría de la evolución. Revista Eureka Sobre Enseñanza y Divulgación de Las Ciencias., 15(3), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.25267/Rev_Eureka_ensen_divulg_cienc.2018.v15.i3.3105
Nadelson, L. S., & Hardy, K. K. (2015). Trust in science and scientists and the acceptance of evolution. Evolution: Education and Outreach, 8(1), 9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12052-015-0037-4
Namakula, E. K., & Akerson, V. L. (2024). Explicit incorporation of the nature of science (NOS) in an undergraduate preservice teacher science content course: Action research. International Journal of Research in Education and Science, 10(2), 241–278. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijres.3354
National Academy of Sciences. (2025). Science and religion. National Academy of Sciences. https://www.nationalacademies.org/evolution/science-and-religion
National Science Teaching Association. (2020). Nature of science. National Science Teaching Association. https://www.nsta.org/nstas-official-positions/nature-science
Nelson, C. E., Scharmann, L. C., Beard, J., & Flammer, L. I. (2019). The nature of science as a foundation for fostering a better understanding of evolution. Evolution: Education and Outreach, 12(1), 6. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12052-019-0100-7
Nouri, N., Saberi, M., McComas, W. F., & Mohammadi, M. (2021). Proposed teacher competencies to support effective nature of science instruction: A meta-synthesis of the literature. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 32(6), 601–624. https://doi.org/10.1080/1046560X.2020.1871206
Osman, K., Razali, R., & Bahri, N. M. (2018). Biological evolution education in Malaysia; Where we are now. In H. Deniz & L. A. Borgerding (Eds.), Evolution Education Around the Globe (pp. 375–390). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90939-4_20
Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., … Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
Pain, R. (2023). Does science evolve? Evolution, 77(12), 2699–2702. https://doi.org/10.1093/evolut/qpad167
Partosa, J. D. (2018). Evolution education in the Philippines: A preliminary investigation. In H. Deniz & L. A. Borgerding (Eds.), Evolution Education Around the Globe (pp. 391–405). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90939-4_21
Saefi, M., Suwono, H., & Hanafi, Y. (2024). From conflict to harmony: Changing conceptual ecology of evolution acceptance of Muslim students after dialogue in science and religion. Evolution: Education and Outreach, 17(1), 8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12052-024-00199-9
Scharmann, L. C. (2018). Evolution and nature of science instruction: A first-person account of changes in evolution instruction throughout a career. Evolution: Education and Outreach, 11(1), 14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12052-018-0088-4
Selba, M. C., Ziegler, M. J., Townley, A. L., & Antonenko, P. D. (2024). Exploring teacher self-efficacy in human evolution instruction following a dynamic hands-on professional development workshop. Evolution: Education and Outreach, 17(1), 5. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12052-024-00197-x
Sloane, J. D., Wheeler, L. B., & Manson, J. S. (2023). Teaching nature of science in introductory biology: Impacts on students’ acceptance of biological evolution. PLOS ONE, 18(8), e0289680. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0289680
Stasinakis, P. K., & Kampourakis, K. (2018). Teaching evolution in Greece. In H. Deniz & L. A. Borgerding (Eds.), Evolution Education Around the Globe (pp. 195–212). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90939-4_11
Wei, C. A., Beardsley, P. M., & Labov, J. B. (2012). Evolution education across the life sciences: Making biology education make sense. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 11(1), 10–16. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.11-12-0111
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Articles may be used for research, teaching, and private study purposes. Authors alone are responsible for the contents of their articles. The journal owns the copyright of the articles. The publisher shall not be liable for any loss, actions, claims, proceedings, demand, or costs or damages whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with or arising out of the use of the research material.
The author(s) of a manuscript agree that if the manuscript is accepted for publication in the journal, the published article will be copyrighted using a Creative Commons “Attribution 4.0 International” license. This license allows others to freely copy, distribute, and display the copyrighted work, and derivative works based upon it, under certain specified conditions.
Authors are responsible for obtaining written permission to include any images or artwork for which they do not hold copyright in their articles, or to adapt any such images or artwork for inclusion in their articles. The copyright holder must be made explicitly aware that the image(s) or artwork will be made freely available online as part of the article under a Creative Commons “Attribution 4.0 International” license.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
