Students’ Perceptions of Low Stakes Positioning Tests at the Start of Higher STEM Education: A Mixed Methods Approach

Authors

  • Jolan Hanssens
  • Greet Langie
  • Carolien Van Soom

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46328/ijemst.2889

Keywords:

Students' perception, Perception of assessment, Higher STEM education, Low stakes assessment

Abstract

In Flanders, open admission into higher education has led to heterogeneity in academic preparedness of incoming STEM students. Higher education institutions offer low stakes positioning tests to these students in order to help them assess their level of starting competences. Due to the unique nature of these tests, little can be inferred about students’ perception of these tests. In this study, we used mixed methods to investigate these perceptions. Semi-structured interviews (n=20) and thematic analysis revealed that students do not always understand the stakes, objective and structure of positioning tests as intended by the organizers. A questionnaire (n=189) revealed that students considered chemistry problems  better reflecting certain study programs than mathematics problems and that they wrongly think chemistry questions are more predictive than mathematics questions. Our findings provide insight in STEM students’ multifaceted perceptions of and interaction with low stakes assessment.

Downloads

Published

2023-07-19

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Students’ Perceptions of Low Stakes Positioning Tests at the Start of Higher STEM Education: A Mixed Methods Approach. (2023). International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 11(5), 1094-1112. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijemst.2889

Similar Articles

1-10 of 472

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.